4/16/2023 0 Comments Nike epic reactThe bottom uses rubber bits but they’re placed outside the rear-strike area and the forefoot transition zone. The lasting below the insole is a thin fabric which does not add cushioning.Įven the outsole isn’t where it needs to be. The insole is a barely-there, wafer-thin kind. Nearly 100% of the cushioning is delivered by the midsole and there’s no blending of the insole softness with the midsole. With the Epic, what you see is what you get. The midsole is full-length React there is no foam lasting or a thick insole masking the ride experience. The midsole design of the Epic React helps isolate its cushioning properties without interference. Because while the React feels great in its cushioned-trainer form, we’re unsure of its performance in lower-profile shoes. Zoom Air will continue to make itself useful in staples such as the Pegasus and racing flats. Given Nike’s recent foray into lower-priced (below $100) shoes, Lunarlon will likely be positioned as a second-tier cushioning tech with the React and ZoomX priced above it. It remains to be seen what will happen to Lunarlon. Both are synthetic rubber based foams, and the React is a definite improvement over the decade-old Lunarlon. The way we see it, the React is an evolution of Lunarlon. We’ll cover these topics in our ride breakout. But then, the Boost outperforms the React in certain aspects, so both materials hold their own. That said, the React definitely seems to be a competitive response to the adidas Boost.įrom a performance viewpoint, the React scores over the Boost in a couple of areas. But React and Boost are so tangential in their chemical composition that it’s unfair to directly compare the React to Boost. There’s a detailed write-up at the end if you’re interested in learning more. To be specific, it’s SEBS (Styrene-Ethylene-Butylene-Styrene). Nike says little on what the React is made of, except for a brief reference to synthetic rubber.Īfter some sleuthing, it appears that the React’s primary ingredient is Styrene. The React feels rubbery because that’s exactly what it is. And based on our ownership experience, the React has proved to be durable as far as cushioning retention is concerned. It provides an excellent damping sensation during longer runs without the mushiness. The React is undoubtedly soft but feels very ‘rubbery’ as opposed to sink-in soft. Nike equates the React with an overdose of softness in its promotional campaign, but that’s not an accurate description of the React. The React has a character distinctly its own and is unlike any other foam we’ve run in. The short answer to the second question is yes. So what is the Nike React, and more importantly, does it live up to the hype? The basketball models use React in combination with a thick outsole which makes it difficult to isolate its true cushioning nature. The Epic React Flyknit is the first model to feature the namesake foam in a relatively undiluted, full-length form. The React platform had a soft launch last year in the form of the React Hyperdunk and Jordan Super.Fly, both performance basketball shoes. So the React comes in at an opportune time, building on a product momentum led by the VaporFly and Zoom Fly. Flyknit has long ceased to be exclusive nowadays even $15 running shoes have knit uppers. Lunarlon falls short from a performance standpoint when compared to foam materials like Boost, Everun, or DNA AMP. Nike Air no longer commands the attention and market share it once did. For far too long, Nike relied on their legacy tech to push their ‘new’ products.īut times have changed. There had been a veritable drought of innovation in the Nike product line.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |